Investigation Reflection

In the investigation proccess of this project I have worked very hard in investigating and looking for a solution to the problem of teaching a 6th grader how to use and understand the design cycle. I would rate myself a 5 on the design cycle rubric because I have explained the problem under the questions that we cut and copied onto our blog. I think I did a really good job investigating because I looked at two resources and I tested both of them and calculated which tool would be better to use by rating it on a one to five rubric that consists of measureing simplicity, passwords, and accessability.  Then I reflected on which would be the better tool, and I choose one based on my ratings in the two rubrics. The only reason why I have rated myself a five and not a six was because I was unable to gain accessability into my first resource because they gave me a password that was hard to type in and help me access the account I had to create in order to use that tool, and if I get to do this project in the future, I would try harder to gain accessability into the first tool. I am now currently working on brainstorming three different design specifications for the tool that I have choosen, and it is realy coming along so far.